Safe City

Safe City

The Function of the Country's Passive Defense Policies on Social Capital in Iran (90s)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Faculty of Law and Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran
2 Associate Professor of National Defense and Strategic Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran
4 Department of Social Sciences, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Today, the approach of threats is changing from hard to soft and relying on psychological operations in
societies. By persuading and changing their behavior, crises and colorful revolutions arise in them;
therefore, to cope passive defense functions are effective; and the role of institutions and policymakers in
opening such spaces should not be neglected.
Social capital is one of the most important indicators of the growth of societies. This concept, which has
entered politics from social sciences, has a wide impact on the relationship between government and
society. The main question of the research is, what effect has the functioning of the country's eight
passive defense policies had on social capital in Iran? The case study method is contextual; in the
quantitative analysis section, the "multiple linear regression" method of "eight independent variables" is
used on "dependent variable". The statistical population is 17 people in the qualitative part and 140
people in the quantitative part of experts in interdisciplinary sciences. The results indicate that the
function of the eight passive defense policies on the components of social capital is significant and their
impact on the components of social capital is different and significant.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Azkia, M., & Firoozabadi, S. A. (1924). Social capital and its role in productive organizations. Iranian Sociology, 1, 12–44.

  2. Azkia, M., & Fari, [Initial missing]. (1925). Sociology of development (6th ed.). Tehran: Keyhan.

  3. Baghi Nasrabadi, A. (1925). Social solidarity and public participation. Hesoun, (4).

  4. Coleman, J. (1932). Foundations of social charity (M. Sabouri, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing.

  5. Ghaffari Farahani, [Initial missing]. (1923). Evaluation of factors affecting civil administration against asymmetric threats with emphasis on passive defense using AHP method. Strategic Defense Studies Quarterly, 14(11), 14–40.

  6. Giddens, A. (2011). Global perspectives (M. R. Jalali Pour, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e No Publishing.

  7. Hashemi Fesharaki, S. J. (1922). Descriptive dictionary of passive defense. Tehran: Elat Afarin.

  8. Mir Mousavi, S. A. (1935). Religious foundations and political culture of participation. Naqd va Nomer, 2(3–4).

  9. Niazi, [Initial missing]. (1924). Social capital and public security. Tehran: NAJA Research Office.

  10. Ritter, J. (1931). Index of sociology in contemporary times (M. Salethi, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi Publishing.

  11. Saroukhani, B. (1925). Research methods in social sciences: Principles and foundations (Vol. 1, 11th ed.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.

  12. Saroukhani, B. (1930). Research methods in social sciences (Vol. 2). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.

  13. Saroukhani, B. (1921). Research methods in social sciences: Principles and foundations (Vol. 1, 6th ed.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.

  14. Strategic Document of the Passive Defense Organization. (1924). Strategic roadmap of the Passive Defense Organization. Tehran: General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

  15. The Statute of the Passive Defense Organization. (1923). Statute of the Passive Defense Organization affiliated with the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

  16. Fukuyama, F. (1934). Social capital and its erosion (A. Tousi, Trans.). Tehran: Hekayat Qalam-e Novin.

  17. The Holy Quran.