Safe City

Safe City

Explanation of design indicators and location of friendly urban spaces with passive defense approach Case example: Soro Bandar Abbas neighborhood

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Behnaz Amin Nayeri 1
Masoud Haghlesan 2
Ehsan davarpanah 3
1 Doctoral of Urban Planning, Department of urban planning, Aras international branch, Islamic Azad university, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ilkhchi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilkhchi, Iran
3 Doctoral of Urban Planning, Department of urban planning, Aras international branch, Islamic Azad university,Tabriz, Iran
10.22034/ispdrc.2022.701307
Abstract
Friendly urban spaces, as the most public spaces, can be the center of civil life and urbanism, passive urban
defense is a part of the executive order with the aim of continuing the necessary activities of the city in
confronting the enemy's military actions. In this article, the main patterns considered in non-active defense
that are used in the design and explanation of friendly urban spaces have been proposed, then the location
of friendly urban spaces has been carried out with the approach of non-active defense in Soro Bandar Abbas
neighborhood. In order to achieve the objectives of the research, the extraction of six selected indicators,
which were used to weight the indicators from the AHP model, finally, two suitable sites for locating the
friendly urban space in Soro neighborhood have been selected based on six indicators. In terms of practical
purpose, and in terms of descriptive-analytical methodology, this research was based on library-field
studies. According to the process undertaken in this research, the model of entering passive urban defense
concepts in explaining the design of friendly urban spaces with the approach of reducing urban vulnerability
during military and natural crises has been proposed. 
Keywords
Friendly urban spaces
Passive Defense
AHP hierarchical method
Risk reduction
safe . place
Military threats
[25] GarciaـRamon., Maria D; Ortiz, A; Parts, M., 2004.Urban Planning, Gender and the use of Public
Space in a Peripheral Neighborhood of Barcelona. Cities, Vol.21, No. 3.
[26] Hiller, B., 1996. Cities as Movement Systems, Urban Design International, 1. 1 (1) pp. 41-60.
10.1057/udi.1996.5.
[27] Jakobs, O., 1965. The Dead Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
[28] Lapintie.1., 2007. modalities of urban space. sage publications.
[29] Misra. R. P: Micro.,1992. Level Rural Planning. chapman and hall. pp.34ـ64.
[30] Sharma.k.l. 2003.the social organization of urban space, sage publications.
[31] Saaty, T. L. 1990. Decision making for leaders. RWS Publications., USA.
[32] Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
[33] Walzer, M.1986. pleasure an costs of urbanity. Dissent 33. (4) pp: 470ـ475.