Safe City

Safe City

Explaining and analyzing the damage of western ideas on the formation of the structure of the urban planning and management system in Iran using three-pronged analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Dariush Sattarzadeh 1
ehsan davarpanah 2
Behnaz Amin nayeri 3
mahsa sodagar 4
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Aras International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Aras International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
4 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/ispdrc.2024.2019621.1081
Abstract
This article follows the pathology of the causes of developments and how Western theories, non-indigenous patterns affect urban management and urban planning in Iran, which has been analyzed using the three-pronged analysis method to identify structural, behavioral and environmental damage and is analyzed in MAXQDA software. In structural damage, the wrong urban planning system with a factor load of 88. The wrong system of imitation of Western thought 88. No use of indigenous architectural elements 88. And the lack of proper planning and localization of Western theories and thought 86. The most important damage in the urban planning system in Iran is in the background damage, the status of the existing laws 98. Urban development projects 96. No use of expert opinions 95. Lack of citizen participation in the urban planning system 86. They're underlying injuries. In behavioral injuries, lack of awareness and knowledge of urban planners with the 98th planning system. Failure to recognize standards and localization 96. Lack of supervision 95. The culture of 91. And the lack of knowledge and knowledge of managers. The results show that the fundamental flaws in theoretical and theoretical structures are the patterns of planning and modeling of them, as well as in the field of Urban Development and planning, which are caused by the lack of localization, the adaptation of theoretical structures to the conditions of the country, and the development of the city. It's that these patterns lack the efficiency to guide development and planning developments in the right direction
This article follows the pathology of the causes of developments and how Western theories, non-indigenous patterns affect urban management and urban planning in Iran, which has been analyzed using the three-pronged analysis method to identify structural, behavioral and environmental damage and is analyzed in MAXQDA software. In structural damage, the wrong urban planning system with a factor load of 88. The wrong system of imitation of Western thought 88. No use of indigenous architectural elements 88. And the lack of proper planning and localization of Western theories and thought 86. The most important damage in the urban planning system in Iran is in the background damage, the status of the existing laws 98. Urban development projects 96. No use of expert opinions 95. Lack of citizen participation in the urban planning system 86. They're underlying injuries. In behavioral injuries, lack of awareness and knowledge of urban planners with the 98th planning system. Failure to recognize standards and localization 96. Lack of supervision 95. The culture of 91. And the lack of knowledge and knowledge of managers. The results show that the fundamental flaws in theoretical and theoretical structures are the patterns of planning and modeling of them, as well as in the field of Urban Development and planning, which are caused by the lack of localization, the adaptation of theoretical structures to the conditions of the country, and the development of the city. It's that these patterns lack the efficiency to guide development and planning developments in the right direction
This article follows the pathology of the causes of developments and how Western theories, non-indigenous patterns affect urban management and urban planning in Iran, which has been analyzed using the three-pronged analysis method to identify structural, behavioral and environmental damage and is analyzed in MAXQDA software. In structural damage, the wrong urban planning system with a factor load of 88. The wrong system of imitation of Western thought 88. No use of indigenous architectural elements 88. And the lack of proper planning and localization of Western theories and thought 86. The most important damage in the urban planning system in Iran is in the background damage, the status of the existing laws 98. Urban development projects 96. No use of expert opinions 95. Lack of citizen participation in the urban planning system 86. They're underlying injuries. In behavioral injuries, lack of awareness and knowledge of urban planners with the 98th planning system. Failure to recognize standards and localization 96. Lack of supervision 95. The culture of 91. And the lack of knowledge and knowledge of managers. The results show that the fundamental flaws in theoretical and theoretical structures are the patterns of planning and modeling of them, as well as in the field of Urban Development and planning, which are caused by the lack of localization, the adaptation of theoretical structures to the conditions of the country, and the development of the city. It's that these patterns lack the efficiency to guide development and planning developments in the right direction
Keywords
Three-pronged Analysis
Western Modernist Thoughts
Urban Development and Management
Contemporary Urban Planning in Iran
Urban Planning System in Iran
Subjects
[1] Ahmadian, R. (2004). The effect of Iran's socio-economic transformations on the formation of the urban
planning system in Iran. political-economic information, (209-210), 140-163. [In Persian] .
[2] Ahmadipour, Z., & Lashgari, E. (2012). Interaction of Historical Processes and Political Economy of the
City Case Study: The Urban System of Iran after the Constitutional Revolution. Sepehr, 21(81), 15-21. [In
Persian].
[3] Asefi, M., & Imani, E. (2014). Recognition and evaluation of the transformational factors of the spirit of
Iranian traditional architecture: originality of the past, novelty of today. Hoviatshahr, 8(19), 63-76. [In
Persian].
[4] Bani Masoud, A. (2020). Contemporary Architecture in Iran: from 1925 to the present. First edition.
Mashhad: Kasra. [In Persian] .
[5] Faqih, N. (1978). The beginning of industrial architecture in Iran. First Edition. Tehran: Tehran Museum of
Contemporary Arts. [In Persian].
[6] Ghamami, M. (2008). About urban planning issues in Iran today. First edition. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian] .
[7] Habibi, S. M. (2007). From Town to City: A Historical Analysis of the Meaning of the City and Its Form.
7th edition. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian] .
[8] Habibi, S.M. (2007). Modernism, city, university, the second modernism in Iran. Goftogu, 3 (5), 83-95. [In
Persian].
[9] Haji Yousefi, A. M. (1997). Rent, rentier government and rentierism: a conceptual review. politicaleconomic information, (125-126), 152-155. [In Persian] .
[10] Hesamian, F., Etemad, G., & Haeri, M. (2009). Urbanization in Iran. 7th Edition. Tehran: Aghah. [In
Persian].
[11] Jackson, W. (2008). Jackson's travelogue of Iran in the past and present. (M. Amiri & F. Badrei Trans).
Fifth Edition. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. [In Persian].
[12] Kamrava, M. A. (2009). Contemporary urban planning in Iran. Third Edition. Tehran: Tehran University
Press. [In Persian].
[13] Katoozian, M. A. (1993). Iran's political economy from constitutionalism to the end of the Pahlavi dynasty.
(M. A. Nafisi & K. Azizi Trans). 2th Edition. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian] .
[14] Moayedahd, P. (1967). An Overviews of urban planning issues. Art and people, (56-57), 18-23. [In Persian].
[15] Mokhtari, E. (2011). The heritage of modern Iranian architecture. First Edition. Tehran: Cultural Research
Office. [In Persian] .
[16] Mokhtari, H. (1947). The history of wakefulness in Iran. Tehran: Tehran University. [In Persian].
[17] Momtahen al-Dawleh, M. (1983). Memoirs of Momtahen al-Dawleh:Biography of Mirza Mehdi Khan
Momtahen al-Dawleh Shaghaghi. (H. Khanshaghaghi Trans). First Edition. Mashhad: Ferdowsi. [In
Persian].
[18] Mostafavi, M. & Mohades, M. (1982). The Historical Monuments of Tehran. First Edition. Tehran:
Association of National Artifacts. [In Persian].
[19] Pakdaman, B. (1991). Three Iranian architects (Vartan Hvansian, Paul Abkar, Gabriel Gurkian). Tehran:
Roshangaran. [In Persian].
[20] Rajabi, P. (1976). Iranian architecture in the Pahlavi era. Tehran: National University of Iran. [In Persian].
[21] Riazi, S. A. (2010). Impact of Modernity on Spatial Structure of City in the late Gajar Dynasty. Iranian
Cultural Research, 3(3), 129-149. [In Persian] .
[22] Richards, F. C. (2011). Travelogue of Fred Richards. (M. D. Saba Trans). Third Edition. Tehran: Scientific
and Cultural Publishing Company. [In Persian].
[23] Rouhbakhshan, A. (1987). The role of Dar ol-Fonun in the expansion of French in Iran. Luqman, 3(2), 33-
54.
[24] Saidi Rizvani, N. (1992). Urbanization and urban development in the twenty-year period of 1921-1941
(during the reign of Reza Khan). Geographical Research, 7 (2 (25)), 140-165. [In Persian].
[25] Saremi, A. A. (1991). Today's antiquity and yesterday's modernism in the architecture of Tehran and Iran.
Tehran: Roshangaran. [In Persian].
[26] Sodagar, M. R. (1978). The development of capitalist relations in Iran: Transitional stage. Tehran: Pazand.
[In Persian]