Safe City

Safe City

Investigating the resilience of smart city infrastructure with a passive defense approach ; Study sample, district 4 of Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In the last two decades, the process of urbanization and industrialization in developed countries has led to the formation of complex cities that are vulnerable to natural and human disasters. The advancement of information technology and the move towards smart cities have helped to improve urban management, but it requires careful planning to reduce vulnerabilities and increase infrastructure security. Urban planning should be done based on the principles of passive and defensive defense so that urban infrastructures are resistant to threats. This research has investigated the issues related to safety and infrastructure smartness in District 4 of Tehran Municipality. The purpose of the research is to identify and interact the necessary infrastructures to achieve resilience, analyze the factors affecting the resilience of urban infrastructures in a smart city and provide planning solutions to strengthen the resilience of infrastructures with a passive defense approach. The research method was designed in an exploratory-analytical way and observation, interview, library studies and questionnaire methods were used to collect information. Data analysis was also done with content analysis methods and various statistical tests and SPSS software was used for scoring. The results of the research show that there is a significant relationship between the environmental physical dimensions of urban planning and passive urban defense with a score of 4.16. The physical component of the environment is known as the most effective factor in reducing risks during the crisis in District 4 of Tehran Municipality. Finally, this research emphasizes that improving the resilience of smart city infrastructure with a passive defense approach can significantly reduce vulnerability.

In recent decades, resilience, passive defense and smart city have been considered for infrastructure planning and urban development. The safety and resilience of infrastructures is one of the fundamental and essential factors, the disruption of which causes crises in societies. Today, many problems and threats have affected human life. The present age has become the age of vulnerability, the cities are developing at the same time with different dimensions, they are facing natural hazards and technological crises, as well as social-security crises. This issue indicates that the development of cities, along with benefits and improvements, is accompanied by serious challenges that should be paid special attention to. Correct and comprehensive management and planning to deal with these crises and risks is essential.

Considering the importance of infrastructures in the city, including sensitive, important and vital; Such as water, electricity, city gas, telecommunication, transportation, health and treatment systems, etc., appropriate solutions should be made for their resilience and protection. These important and essential parts in any city may be attacked by the enemy, and in case of damage to the vital infrastructure, a lot of damage will be done to the entire city's systems and the life of citizens will be disturbed. According to the characteristics of the smart city, it can be said that the infrastructures become more important in the smart city. Planning for the growth and development of the smart city is facing many challenges. In today's societies, the smart city has a special place in cities and has become an influential field in urban planning. With the expansion of urbanization and the increase of urban population, cities are facing many challenges that cannot be solved by traditional methods. In this regard, information and communication technology has had a significant impact on the urban society in recent years and the trend is increasing. In this context, the concept of "smart city" has gained a special place and has become one of the influential fields in urban planning and management. This approach is based on the use of new technologies to improve efficiency, productivity and provide urban services to citizens. Therefore, the use of smart technologies along with new planning approaches can lead to solving the challenges of today's cities and improving the quality of life of citizens.

In this research, the main infrastructures in the 4th district of Tehran Municipality will be examined and discussed in the form of 6 chapters, and by studying planning and smart building in the world, the country and Tehran, the possible effects and challenges on them will be examined, and finally Appropriate solutions will be presented in accordance with the requirements of passive defense and the findings of the research will be analyzed and in the final summary, a way to mention possible solutions will be taken.
Keywords
Subjects

  • Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 3-21.
  • Arafah, Y. (2017). Redefining smart city concept with resilience approach.70(2017)012065
  • Tzioutziou , A. (2021). A Study on the Integration of Resilience and Smart City Concepts in Urban Systems.
  • Baron, M.(2012). DO WE NEED SMART CITIES FOR RESILIENCE. Volume 10.
  • Brandon, P. (2011), Extreme Management in Disaster Recovery, Journal of Procedia Engineering, No. 14, pp 14-21.
  • Cassotta, S. (2019). Sustainable cybersecurity? Rethinking approaches to protecting energy infrastructure in the European High North. 51(2019) 129-133
  • Chaturvedi, K. (2019). Securing Spatial Data Infrastructures for Distributed Smart City applications and services. 101(2019) 723-736.
  • Chen, D., Wawrzynski, P., & Lv, Z. (2020). Cyber security in smart cities: A
    review of deep learning-based applications and case studies.
  • Collier, P., and Venables, a (2016). Urban Infrastructure for Development, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, (32), 391– 409.
  • Fesharaki, S. & Mahmoudzadeh, A. (2012). Description of passive defense. Isfahan: Science Publications Congratulations.
  • Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City, 12(3), 303-320.
  • Holling, C. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 1-23.
  • Holling, C. (1996). Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience. Eng. Ecol. Constraints, 31-43.
  • Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38
  • Lacina, B. (2006), Explaining the Severity of Civil Wars, Journal of Conflict Resolution, No. 50, P.276.
  • Lara, A. P., Da Costa, E. M., Furlani, T. Z., & Yigitcanla, T. (2016). Smartness that matters: towards a comprehensive and human-centred characterisation of smart cities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(2), 8.
  • Marzouk, M. (2020). Planning utility infrastructure requirements for smart cities using the integration between BIM and GIS. 57,102120
  • Mohammadpourfard, M., Khalili, A., Genc, I., & Konstantinou, C. (2021).
    Cyber-Resilient Smart Cities: Detection of Malicious Attacks in Smart
    Grids. Sustainable Cities and Society, 103116.
  • Nam, T., & Pardo, T. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times, 282-291.
  • Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25-36.
  • Ouyang, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L., & Min, X. A. (2012). A Three-Stage Resilience Analysis Framework for Urban Infrastructure Systems. 36-37, 23-31.
  • Shah, J. (2019). A Survey of Smart City infrastructure via Case study on New York.702-705
  • Tamvakis, P. (2012). Comparative Evaluation of Resilience QuantificationMethods for Infrastructure Systems. 74 ( 2013 ) 339 – 348
  • Wisner, B., Walker, P. & Beyond Kobe, A. (2005). Feinstein International Famine Center. Proactive Look at the World Conference on Disaster Reduction. 18-22 January Kobe, Japan. A report for the Swiss Department of Humanitarian Aid.
  • Walker, B., Holling, C., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecol. Soc., 9(2).
  • Zhu, S. (2019). Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China. 50(2019) 101636.
    Sustainable Cities and Society, 102655. DOI

 

 

Persian References

 

  • Kamran, Hassan, & Hosseini, Amin Hassan. (2011). Application of passive defense in urban and regional planning. Scientific and Research Quarterly of Geographical Space, 12(38), 215-227.
    • Hosseini Amini, Hassan, Asadi, Sarvenaz, Mahdi. (2010). Evaluation of the structure of Langarud city in urban planning with a passive defense approach. Journal of Applied Geography Research, 15(18), 129-149.
    • Akhbari, Mohammad, & Ahmadi Moghaddam, Mohammad Ali. (2014). Examining passive defense in urban management. Geopolitics Quarterly, 10, 36069.
    • Maleki Pour, Mousa. (2010). Roshd Journal, Geography, Volume 25, Issue 25, Imbalance in the urban settlement system of Ilam. Roshd Journal, 25(2), 58.
    • Zangi Abadi, Ali & Esmaeilian, Zahra. (2012). Analysis of vulnerability indices of urban housing against natural hazards: A case study of Isfahan city housing. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 1(4), 113-129.
    • Mohammadi Deh Cheshmeh, Mostafa & Heidari Nia, Saeed. (2015). Spatial modeling of the proximity of special land uses from the perspective of passive defense in Ahvaz metropolis. Planning and Spatial Planning Quarterly, 19(2), 211-236.
    • Rostaei Shahrivar, Pourmohammadi, Mohammad Reza & Ghanbari, Hakimeh. (2018). Study, analysis, and review of the theory of the smart city and evaluation of its infrastructural components in urban management: A case study of Tabriz Municipality. Geography and Urban Planning, 26, 197-216.
    • Saeed Amanpour, Mostafa Mohammadi Deh Cheshmeh, Mehdi Alizadeh. (2016). Evaluation of vulnerability of urban infrastructures in Kuhdasht city with a passive defense approach. Territorial Planning, 133-154.
    • Mohammad Taghi Razavian, Mehdi Alian, Hossein Rostami. (2018). Evaluation of the spatial vulnerability of YAZD province’s infrastructures with a passive defense approach. Territorial Planning, 1, 31-63.
    • Afsharian Seyedin, Saeed Amini Varki, Hossein Rostami, Mohammad Hossein Yazdani. (2017). Evaluation of the spatial vulnerability of Ardabil province’s infrastructures with a passive defense approach. Territorial Planning, 2, 323-362.
    • Ali Soltani, Zahra Pastoon. (2018). Evaluation of the vulnerability of the infrastructures of the new city of Sadra with a passive defense approach. Non-active Defense Scientific Association.
    • Kavous Ali Nejad Taibi, Enayat Faraji Pour Chegini. (2017). Pathology of urban facilities and infrastructures in Firuzabad city with a passive defense approach. Shiraz University.
    • Sima Saeedi Nia, Sedigheh Lotfi, Gholamreza Malekshahi. (2016). Review of the urban transportation status in relation to the smart city approach in Nishapur city. Mazandaran University.
    • Shahrivar Rostaei, Mohammad Reza Pourmohammadi, Hakimeh Ghanbari. (2018). The theory of smart city and evaluation of its infrastructural components in urban management: A case study of Tabriz Municipality. Geography and Urban Planning, 26, 197-216.
    • Roghieh Hajizadeh Toosi, Mohammad Reza Samiee, Mohammad Ghasem Movahedi. (2016). Infrastructure and the necessity of moving towards smart cities with a view to the activities of Mashhad Municipality. First National Conference on Smart City, 10.
    • Amir Hassan Nosrati, Mostafa Ghazi Moradi. (2021). A review of the literature on research conducted in the field of smart city infrastructure with a crisis management approach.
    • Mona Ariaei, Sasan Ariaei. Study and evaluation of smart city infrastructure with a crisis management approach. Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Management.- Fatemeh Karimi, Samaneh Jalili Sadrabad. (2019). Examining the role of urban infrastructure resilience indicators in the resilience cycle process in their interaction according to experts' opinions.