نشریه علمی شهر ایمن

نشریه علمی شهر ایمن

حفاظت از سیلوهای گندم، مدیریت ریسک و اقدامات پیشگیرانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 پژوهشگر و کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی پدافندغیرعامل گرایش طراحی، دانشکده و پژوهشکده پدافند غیرعامل، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(علیه السلام)، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(علیه السلام)، تهران، ایران
3 پژوهشگر و دانشجوی دکتری معماری، دانشکده و پژوهشکده پدافند غیرعامل، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(علیه السلام)، تهران، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش به بررسی و ارزیابی روش‌های مدیریت ریسک و آسیب‌پذیری سیلوهای نگهداری غلات در یک اداره غله و خدمات بازرگانی با استفاده از مدل FEMA و بهره‌گیری از مطالعات اسنادی، بازدیدهای میدانی و نظرات کارشناسان می‌پردازد. هدف اصلی این مطالعه، شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی تهدیدات احتمالی، تعیین آسیب‌پذیری‌های سیلو و ارائه راهکارهایی جهت ارتقای امنیت آن بوده است. بر اساس یافته‌های تحقیق، تهدیدات اولویت‌دار شامل حملات بیولوژیکی، سایبری، تروریستی، موشکی، خرابکاری فنی و هوایی شناسایی شدند که از میان آن‌ها، حملات موشکی بالاترین ریسک را برای سیلوهای گندم به همراه دارند. همچنین، بر اساس ارزیابی انجام شده، آسیب‌پذیری‌های موجود در بخش‌های مختلف سیلو شناسایی و راهکارهایی برای کاهش ریسک، ازجمله مقاوم‌سازی سازه‌ای، اقدامات پدافند غیرعامل (برقی، مکانیکی و کالبدی)، همچنین اقدامات مدیریتی و منابع انسانی درنظر گرفته شد. این اقدامات شامل نصب سیستم‌های امنیتی، استفاده از مواد ضد باکتری، ایجاد ساختارهای مقاوم در برابر انفجار و برنامه‌های آموزشی برای کارکنان می باشد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که با تحلیل دقیق تهدیدات، ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری و به‌کارگیری راهکارهای مدیریتی، می‌توان سطح امنیت سیلوهای گندم را به‌طور چشمگیری ارتقاء داد. این مطالعه می‌تواند به عنوان مبنایی برای تدوین سیاست‌ها و اقدامات کلان در جهت حفاظت از دارایی‌ها و منابع حیاتی در بخش‌های مشابه مورد استفاده قرار گیرد و تأکید دارد که یک رویکرد جامع مدیریت ریسک برای امنیت سیلوها، ضروری است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Protection of wheat silos, risk management and preventive measures

نویسندگان English

hadi bagherian 1
Seyyed Javad Hashemi Shaharaki 2
Seyyed Ahmad Mahdinia 3
1 Researcher and Master of Science in Passive Defense Engineering, Design Orientation, Faculty and Research Institute of Passive Defense, Imam Hussein University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Imam Hussein University, Tehran, Iran
3 Researcher and PhD student in Architecture, Faculty and Research Institute of Passive Defense, Imam Hussein University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Urban areas, as densely populated human settlements, necessitate comprehensive security and safety measures across various dimensions, including physical infrastructure, social stability, economic resilience, cultural continuity, and administrative governance. The growing complexity of modern cities, coupled with increasing geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and technological threats, underscores the critical need for robust risk mitigation strategies. Among these strategies, passive defense refers to a set of strategic measures designed to minimize human casualties and financial losses inflicted upon critical infrastructure, essential facilities, and sensitive military and civilian locations. Unlike active defense, which relies on direct military engagement, passive defense measures focus on proactive, preemptive actions to enhance urban resilience. These measures encompass a broad spectrum of techniques, including strategic site selection, structural fortification, dispersion, relocation, barrier implementation, camouflage, concealment, deception, mobility, and protective coverage.
One of the most critical aspects of passive defense is ensuring the security and resilience of urban food storage facilities, such as silos and warehouses. These infrastructures play a pivotal role in maintaining food security and societal stability, particularly in times of crisis. Any potential threat to their integrity can have profound repercussions on national food supply systems, economic stability, and public health. Given their strategic significance, these storage facilities must be safeguarded against both conventional and unconventional threats, including terrorist attacks, cyber threats, natural disasters, supply chain disruptions, and contamination risks, to ensure continuous and reliable food distribution.
According to Warden’s Five-Ring Model, food storage warehouses are categorized within the second ring, which represents essential systemic functions akin to power plants, refineries, heavy industries, fuel reservoirs, defense industries, ammunition depots, pharmaceutical supplies, and water distribution networks. This classification underscores their fundamental role in sustaining national infrastructure. The significance of these facilities extends beyond merely storing food; they act as key logistical hubs, enabling efficient food distribution in urban and rural areas. In the event of an emergency, whether due to war, economic sanctions, or natural calamities, the operational continuity of food storage facilities becomes a critical determinant of national resilience.
This study employs risk assessment and management methodologies, utilizing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) framework in conjunction with documentary research and field studies to evaluate the vulnerabilities of food storage silos. To achieve a comprehensive understanding of these vulnerabilities, data collection involved on-site inspections, expert interviews, and structured questionnaires. The study’s statistical sample comprised 30 professionals specializing in various fields related to passive defense, occupational safety, and health management. Specifically, 10 participants were experts in passive defense strategies, while 3 specialists were selected from the field of Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE). The collected data underwent rigorous analysis to identify, categorize, and prioritize risk factors, culminating in the formulation of an extensive index of vulnerability determinants associated with food storage silos.
Findings from the analysis reveal that effective risk management within food storage silos constitutes a vital component of national infrastructure resilience. Identified threats include cyberattacks targeting silo management systems, physical threats such as explosions or fires, deliberate food contamination, hazardous chemical leaks, and deficiencies in regulatory oversight and safety monitoring. Given the multifaceted nature of these threats, the implementation of comprehensive security measures is imperative to enhance the resilience of food storage facilities and mitigate risks associated with potential crises.
In response to these risks, several key strategies have been proposed to strengthen silo security. First, enhancing cybersecurity measures within silo management systems is essential, as cyber threats pose significant risks to the digital infrastructure that controls storage operations. The integration of blockchain technology for secure food supply chain tracking can further reduce vulnerabilities related to tampering or contamination. Second, investments in advanced surveillance systems, including AI-driven anomaly detection and real-time monitoring, can enhance situational awareness and allow for rapid response to potential threats. Third, the physical reinforcement of silos through improved structural materials and fire-resistant coatings can significantly increase their resilience against both man-made and natural disasters.
Moreover, by integrating modern passive defense methodologies, fostering workforce awareness and training, leveraging advanced monitoring and control technologies, optimizing ventilation and storage conditions, and reinforcing structural integrity, this research underscores the necessity of proactive strategies in securing critical food storage infrastructures. The adoption of smart monitoring systems and digital innovations, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), can significantly enhance real-time surveillance and facilitate rapid preventive interventions in emergency scenarios. Additionally, automated inventory management systems can improve operational efficiency and reduce the likelihood of food spoilage due to poor oversight.
Beyond technical measures, national and local policy frameworks must be restructured to reinforce food security and minimize dependence on external supply chains. One recommended approach is the strategic decentralization of food storage facilities, ensuring an even geographical distribution to mitigate the adverse effects of localized disruptions. The creation of emergency food reserves in multiple locations would further enhance resilience by preventing overreliance on a single, centralized supply network. Furthermore, fostering interagency collaboration among security organizations, emergency management entities, and food distribution networks is essential for establishing a robust and adaptive food storage system.
This study serves as a foundational step toward a broader investigation into crisis management and passive defense strategies within food storage infrastructure. Given the spectrum of potential threats, developing long-term strategic policies for the protection and sustainability of these facilities is of paramount importance. The insights derived from this research aim to guide policymakers, security officials, and urban planners in implementing effective measures to enhance food storage security and mitigate the risks associated with emerging threats. Ultimately, these findings contribute to the formulation of comprehensive safety regulations and strategic frameworks designed to fortify food supply resilience on both national and global scales.
By bridging technological advancements, security policies, and infrastructure development, this research highlights the critical need for interdisciplinary collaboration in food security planning. As cities continue to expand and global uncertainties intensify, the resilience of food storage infrastructure will remain a defining factor in national stability and crisis preparedness. Therefore, continued research, investment, and innovation in passive defense strategies are essential to safeguarding the future of food security in urban environments.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Silo
FEMA
Passive Defense
Risk Management
Protection
 
[1]    A.Jafari, et al. (2021). Handbook of Response to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Incidents.
               
[2]    A.Mahmoudzadeh and G. R. H. Fesharaki (2013). escriptive Dictionary of Passive Defense. Isfahan, Elm Afarin Publications.
               
[3]    A.R.Rostami and M. M. Khani (2016). Examination of Risks in Wheat Silo Construction (Metal-Concrete Silos and Simple and Mechanized Warehouses) Before, During, and After Project Implementation, by the Specialized Parent Company of the Government Trading Corporation of Iran (Case Study: 70,000-Ton Mechanized Warehouse in Boukan). International Conference on Urban Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Architecture.
               
[4]    A.S.Anvar and M.R.Davoodi (1988). The Effect of Earthquake,Proceedings of the First Seminar on Silos and Storage Facilities in the Country, University of Tehran.
               
[5]    Aghbolaghi, M. B. (2011). Risk Assessment and a Step-by-Step Guide to Reducing the Potential for Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings.
               
[6]    Asl, V. H., et al. (2018). "The Model of Risk Assessment of Critical Assets of a Geographical Area (Province) by Emphasis on Passive Defense." Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge 8(1): 27-41.
               
[7]    Golkhatmi, I. G. (2015). "Criteria Collection For Essential Items Storage Locating
[8]    with Passive Defense Approach." Passive Defense 6(2): 1-12. [In Persion].
               
[9]    H.Mashhadi (2015). Threat Assessment, Vulnerability, and Risk in Critical Infrastructures. Tehran, Malek Ashtar University of Technology Publications.
               
[10] H.Zarghani, et al. (2016). Analysis of Terrorist Threats and the Security of Critical Urban Infrastructure. Passive Defense and Sustainable Development Conference.
               
[11] I.Elyasian (2022). Special Structures.
               
[12] I.Mohammadfam and K.Gholamizadeh (2021). "Assessment of Security Risks by FEMA and Fuzzy FEMA Methods, A Case Study: Combined Cycle Power Plant." Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 8(2): 16-23 [In Persion].
               
[13] J.Farahani and G. R. H. Fesharaki (2010). Passive Defense in the Mirror of Laws and Regulations. Tehran, aghsh-e Yas Publications.
               
[14] M.Bornafar and K.Afradi (2014). "Prioritization of vital, sensitive, and important centers in the city of Bandar Anzali and providing defensive solutions from a passive defense perspective." Applied Research in Geographical Sciences 14(32): 161-179. [In Pession].
               
[15] M.Dibai (1992). "The Status of Silos and Wheat Storage Facilities in the Country."
               
[16] M.Taji, e. a. (2019). ""Evaluation and simulation of the vulnerability of hazardous material storage warehouses against threats with a passive defense approach"." RESILIENT CITY 1(4).
               
[17] N.Dilmaqani (1992). "Damage to Reinforced Concrete Silos."
               
[18] P.Safa (2007). Fortifications and Secure Structures. Tehran, Malek Ashtar University of Technology.
               
[19] R.Assef (2008). Intelligence Organizations. Tehran, Faculty and Research Institute of Information and Security.
               
[20] T.GHovahi (2012). An Introduction to Secure Structures and Fortifications. Tehran, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University Press.
               
[21] Y.Darvishi and V.Samadzadeh (2020). "Evaluation of the flexibility of open spaces in urban neighborhoods in terms of passive defense (Case study: District 1 in Tabriz)." Studies Of Human Settlements Planning 15(4): 1291-1308. [In Persion].
               
[22] Y.Maghami, et al. (2010). Optimal site selection for the construction of a wheat silo using GIS and AHP hierarchical analysis (Case study: Abadeh County). 2nd Iranian Geography Student Congress.
               
[23] Yu, G., et al. (2021). "Comprehensive study on the catastrophic explosion of ammonium nitrate stored in the warehouse of Beirut port." Process Safety and Environmental Protection 152: 201-219.